Stadium Operations Lighting Validation LED Content Preview

How St. Louis City SC validated
$80K lighting changes

At St. Louis City SC's Energizer Park, every lighting configuration test meant powering up physical systems, disrupting operations, with no guarantee the result would meet expectations. One mistake during a live broadcast could cost the venue its reputation and sponsor relationships.

St. Louis City SC Energizer Park

The problem: Costly physical testing

St. Louis City SC's leadership needed to validate configurations before committing to them, without bearing the cost of mistakes after deployment.

Physical testing costs
Labor, power, and venue downtime
$15K–$80K
Per physical lighting test, including labor, power, and venue downtime
48–72 hours
Lead time to schedule each test window without disrupting events
Live broadcast errors
A misconfigured LED panel is visible to everyone during a live broadcast
Why the process had to change
Approval and budget pressure

Sponsors were demanding approval workflows for their content before it hit the LED panels. The venue couldn't show them anything without powering up the entire system.

Meanwhile, the operations team was using up its testing budget three months into the season, with no clear path to validate upcoming configurations.

Leadership needed a way to preview, iterate, and get stakeholder sign-off without touching the physical hardware.

Budget pressure Sponsor expectations Tight event windows Brand risk

Client: St. Louis City SC

Major League Soccer expansion team with a $458M state-of-the-art stadium

"If the City wants a partner who can translate complex civic infrastructure into an intuitive, constantly up-to-date digital asset and then make that asset genuinely useful to planners, architects, and everyday residents, ARS is the group. They proved it with CITY SC: they listen first, ideate with you, prototype quickly, and leave you with a tool that saves real dollars while inspiring better ideas. I'm excited to see what they can unlock for the City of St. Louis."

— Jeremy Tripp, Director of Digital Experience, St. Louis CITY SC
Constraint
No new hardware

The solution had to work with existing infrastructure and integrate into current approval workflows.

Constraint
Live scenarios

Stakeholders needed to interact with scenarios live rather than wait hours for pre-rendered clips.

Constraint
Physics-accurate output

Lighting behavior and LED color reproduction had to match the physical venue to within measurable tolerance.

The approach: A digital twin for lighting and LED decisions

ARS built an operational, real-time simulation of Energizer Park, where teams could test, iterate on, and approve lighting scenarios and LED configurations before touching physical systems.

Capabilities

Physics-based lighting simulation

Lighting behavior was modeled to match the venue's physical systems.

LED panel content preview

Sponsors could see exactly how their content would render on specific panels, in context.

Real-time scenario switching

Test 10 configurations in the time it previously took to schedule one physical test.

Stakeholder-ready interface

Non-technical users could navigate, review, and approve without engineering support.

1) Replicate
3D

High-fidelity digital twin matching physical lighting systems and LED panel specifications.

2) Simulate
Real-time

Interactive scenario testing with physics-accurate lighting behavior and content rendering.

3) Validate
Approve

Stakeholder review and sign-off before any physical deployment or testing.

The results: Faster, lower-risk validation

The digital twin let St. Louis City SC validate lighting and LED configurations before physical tests and plan those tests in advance.

85%

Reduction in physical tests

Most configurations validated entirely in simulation before any hardware activation.

10×

Faster scenario iteration

What took 48+ hours to schedule now happens in minutes.

Zero

Live broadcast surprises

Every lighting configuration and sponsor content validated before going live.

Cost reduction

A testing budget that was exhausted by mid-season now covers the full year. Physical tests are reserved for final validation of approved configurations.

Lower testing costs Reduced power usage Less downtime

Stakeholder confidence

Sponsors approve content through the digital twin before physical deployment. The operations team signs off on lighting scenarios using a visual preview.

Sponsor sign-off Visual approval Risk reduction

Where this approach fits

This approach fits complex physical environments where validation is expensive, risky, or time-constrained.

This approach works when:

Testing in the physical environment is expensive or disruptive

Stakeholders need to see outcomes before committing resources

Mistakes at deployment carry significant cost or reputational risk

You need to iterate faster than physical testing allows

Digital twins support earlier decisions

Digital twins let teams make decisions before physical deployment, when changes cost less and iteration is faster. The technology should support the decisions teams need to make.

About Another Reality Studio

ARS is a technology studio specializing in high-fidelity virtual, augmented, and mixed reality systems. We work across healthcare, education, entertainment, and enterprise to build immersive systems that solve real operational problems.

We work as a long-term technical partner. Projects integrate directly into existing workflows, allowing teams to validate decisions, simulate outcomes, and reduce risk before committing real-world resources.

Digital Twin Environments AI-Assisted Simulation Synthetic Data Pipelines Real-Time Visualization

Discuss your use case

If physical validation requires too much time, money, or operational risk, or stakeholders need to see outcomes before moving forward, we should talk.

What to include in your note
  • The physical environment or system you're trying to validate
  • What validation costs you today (time, money, disruption)
  • Who needs to approve or review outcomes
  • Timeline constraints or upcoming deadlines

This case study is developed and delivered by Another Reality Studio.